You are hereWestern view from our suite, of the Mirage pool. Was not expecting Vegas to be cold, wet and humid.

Western view from our suite, of the Mirage pool. Was not expecting Vegas to be cold, wet and humid.

  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/yd51llube7rk/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 879.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_validate() should be compatible with views_handler::options_validate($form, &$form_state) in /home/yd51llube7rk/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 589.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_submit() should be compatible with views_handler::options_submit($form, &$form_state) in /home/yd51llube7rk/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 589.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_validate() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_validate(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/yd51llube7rk/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_row.inc on line 135.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/yd51llube7rk/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_row.inc on line 135.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/yd51llube7rk/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 879.

By Brian - Posted on 08 March 2010

Western view from our suite, of the Mirage pool. Was not expecting Vegas to be cold, wet and humid.

Tweets

  • @sowrey I can't possibly cover all the points Keith made in his presentation, you should really check it out, should be online in a day or 2
    16 years 1 week ago
  • @sowrey you guys are knocking MS/IE (and deservedly so), but HTML5's design largely makes such concerns surprisingly moot
    16 years 1 week ago
  • @humantorch @sowrey the main new html5 thing that IE doesn't support is styling arbitrary tags (ie, <header>), and there's scripts for that
    16 years 1 week ago
  • @humantorch @sowrey html5 codifies stuff that has ALWAYS worked, but has been defined as "invalid". It reflects current browser reality
    16 years 1 week ago
  • @humantorch @sowrey but that's the beauty of it, most "new" stuff in HTML5 (eg, <!DOCTYPE html>) ALREADY WORKS in IE. It's designed that way
    16 years 1 week ago
  • To summarize "Priority of Constituencies": In case of conflict, Users > Authors > Implementors > Specifiers > Theoretical Purity. #drupalcon
    16 years 1 week ago
  • Been "meh" on HTML5; assumed browser support would take years, Keith really sold me on how well thought out the backwards compatibility is
    16 years 1 week ago
  • Keith: "Priority of constituencies", brilliant slide. #drupalcon http://twitpic.com/2ia82c
    16 years 1 week ago
  • Keith on HTML5 vs Flash (ie video): It's not a war, use both! Embed Flash inside <video>, browsers that understand <vid> will ignore Flash
    16 years 1 week ago
  • Keith on HTML5 design principles: Eliminate Unnecessary Complexity, Support Existing Content, Solve Real Problems. #drupalcon
    16 years 1 week ago